Asia Society India Centre hosted Shyam Saran, former Foreign Secretary
and Ambassador, and Madhav Das Nalapat, India’s first Professor of
Geopolitics and Vice Chair of the Manipal Advanced Research Group, for a
discussion centred around Saran’s career as a senior foreign Diplomat
and his new book ‘How India Sees the World: Kautilya to the 21st
Century’.
The discussion began with an analysis of India’s national identity.
Saran observed that there is no single idea of ‘India’ - that by virtue
of its location at the intersection of various caravan and maritime
routes, India has historically been able to assimilate from many
different cultures, making it cosmopolitan and comfortable with
plurality, which is an asset in today’s globalized world. Nalapat asked
why no serious attempt had been made to define core elements of
nationhood in India, Saran responded saying there can be no one idea
because India is too diverse and heterogeneous, and trying to utilize a
singular model of national identity would be counterproductive for a
country as plural as India.
As the discussion moved to foreign policy, Nalapat sought to understand
what the need was for a substantial country like India to follow the
policy of non-alignment in its early years. Saran argued, that it made
complete sense for a country like India, which had just achieved
independence from colonial rule, to avoid becoming subordinate to
another power. Saran also pointed out how India had managed to maintain
strategic alliances, such as with the Soviet Union, despite the
non-alignment policy. He said that this “strategic autonomy”, has always
been a goal of Indian foreign policy and one that successive
administrations have tried to achieve and maintain.
Regarding India’s immediate neighbours, Saran opined that China has been
India’s most significant foreign policy challenge till date (both in
terms of being a threat as well as an opportunity) and is likely to grow
in significance. Saran emphasized that there is much potential for
cooperation between the two countries, recounting instances during his
own career when he had witnessed this, such as during the Copenhagen
climate change negotiations of 2009 or negotiations on general trade
issues.
No comments:
Post a Comment