Asia Society India Centre hosted Shyam Saran, former Foreign Secretary 
and Ambassador, and Madhav Das Nalapat, India’s first Professor of 
Geopolitics and Vice Chair of the Manipal Advanced Research Group, for a
 discussion centred around Saran’s career as a senior foreign Diplomat 
and his new book ‘How India Sees the World: Kautilya to the 21st 
Century’. 
The discussion began with an analysis of India’s national identity. 
Saran observed that there is no single idea of ‘India’ - that by virtue 
of its location at the intersection of various caravan and maritime 
routes, India has historically been able to assimilate from many 
different cultures, making it cosmopolitan and comfortable with 
plurality, which is an asset in today’s globalized world. Nalapat asked 
why no serious attempt had been made to define core elements of 
nationhood in India, Saran responded saying there can be no one idea 
because India is too diverse and heterogeneous, and trying to utilize a 
singular model of national identity would be counterproductive for a 
country as plural as India. 
As the discussion moved to foreign policy, Nalapat sought to understand 
what the need was for a substantial country like India to follow the 
policy of non-alignment in its early years. Saran argued, that it made 
complete sense for a country like India, which had just achieved 
independence from colonial rule, to avoid becoming subordinate to 
another power. Saran also pointed out how India had managed to maintain 
strategic alliances, such as with the Soviet Union, despite the 
non-alignment policy. He said that this “strategic autonomy”, has always
 been a goal of Indian foreign policy and one that successive 
administrations have tried to achieve and maintain. 
Regarding India’s immediate neighbours, Saran opined that China has been
 India’s most significant foreign policy challenge till date (both in 
terms of being a threat as well as an opportunity) and is likely to grow
 in significance. Saran emphasized that there is much potential for 
cooperation between the two countries, recounting instances during his 
own career when he had witnessed this, such as during the Copenhagen 
climate change negotiations of 2009 or negotiations on general trade 
issues. 
No comments:
Post a Comment