By M D Nalapat
Largely
 unreported in the media, Indian nationals who joined ISIS continue to 
be killed in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and even the Philippines. 
In
 the United States, those without medical insurance have to wait until 
an illness turns critical for them to be admitted to a hospital, despite
 healthcare in such cases being several times more expensive than when 
an ailment is battled at an early stage. Similarly in India, very often a
 security threat develops in a climate of official denial, often for 
decades, before erupting. Take Kashmir, where the Indira Gandhi-Sheikh 
Abdullah accord facilitated the entry of Wahhabi groups into the Valley 
beginning in the 1970s. Several hundred religious schools mentored by 
religious radicals were set up, even as hundreds were allowed to return 
from the Pakistan-controlled side to those parts still left in India. 
These were largely left alone by security agencies as being merely 
“pious youth”, yet it was these individuals who participated in the 
genocide of Pandits in Kashmir. For close to two decades ending in 1989,
 the steady indoctrination of Kashmiri youth by Wahhabi groups, intent 
on duplicating the Afghanistan strategy in India, was underplayed by 
security agencies. In Punjab as well, J.S. Bhindranwale was sponsored by
 no less than a Union Home Minister, because he opposed the political 
and personal rivals of Zail Singh within both the Congress as well as 
the Akali Dal. Those active in the ISI-sponsored Khalistan movement in 
Canada, the US and the UK were allowed free entry into the Punjab to 
spread their toxic message. Foreign financiers and publicists for 
Khalistan should have their visas cancelled. Those recruited by ISIS 
across India should not be indulged as “pious” or “misguided” youth, but
 as vectors of terror needing to be sanitised before causing mass 
casualties.
ISIS represents a more potent threat to the stability of 
India because of the boundary-less appeal of the core doctrine of the 
movement, which is that its leadership alone has the knowledge and the 
will to prevail over its foes and to provide a governance system that it
 claims would approximate that of the golden age of Islam. The takeover 
this year of Marawi in the Philippines by ISIS may inspire clusters 
elsewhere to attempt similar land grabs in locations where they confront
 inadequate or incompetent security forces. Takeovers of towns even for a
 few weeks would create a destabilising dynamic and spread of the 
movement within several countries where unemployment and misgovernance 
are rife. Add to that the potential for small groups of recruits 
anywhere in the world to commit localised acts of mass terror. These 
include the 80-plus attacks—with close to 700 casualties—carried out in 
Europe and North America since 2015. The region around India has already
 been systematically infiltrated by ISIS through groups such as the 
Jundul Khalifa Bilal al Hind and the Wilayat Khorasan. Security agencies
 need to keep pace with such an expansion. While two dozen modules in 
India have been discovered and destroyed, it could be that ISIS is still
 in the process of building up its network in India, before it begins 
launching attacks on the scale seen in Pakistan, Afghanistan and 
Bangladesh. Security agencies need to work out counteroffensives that 
multiply the use of cyber and psywar before ISIS graduates from the 
stage of building up its capabilities to joining in the ISI’s existing 
non-conventional war against India.
Conservative (official) estimates are that around 400 Indian nationals have been confirmed as having been recruited into different cells of ISIS, but the number is almost certainly much more.
ISIS, the latest avatar of global Wahhabi terror, is 
distinguished by the sophistication of its social media usage and reach.
 Given the determined use of encrypted methods of communication by 
extremists, it is certain that a large proportion of new recruits to 
ISIS in India are as yet unknown to the security agencies. Conservative 
(official) estimates are that around 400 Indian nationals have been 
confirmed as having been recruited into different cells of ISIS, but the
 number is almost certainly much more. Worse, more than 4,700 radicals 
from Malaysia, Indonesia, Maldives, Bangladesh, Pakistan and Afghanistan
 have been confirmed as having joined ISIS battle groups in Syria, Iraq 
and Libya. For them, India is a tempting alternative target, now that 
the organisation is being pushed back from the territory it has 
controlled since 2014. 
Among the reasons against taking in Rohingyas is the fact 
that the terror hubs in Bangladesh are as enthusiastic as their 
counterparts in Afghanistan and Pakistan in planning for “bringing back 
through jihad the glory of the past” to India. Largely unreported in the
 media, Indian nationals who joined ISIS continue to be killed in Syria,
 Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and even the Philippines. A recent casualty 
was a youth from Kasargod in Kerala, Mohammad Marwan. Over the past two 
years, estimates by global security agencies compute the number of 
Indian citizens killed during confrontations with ISIS as being in 
excess of thirty.
The earlier history of downplaying threats in Punjab and 
Kashmir until it was too late to save hundreds of lives should not be 
repeated in the case of ISIS. The virus needs to be eliminated while 
still in its initial stages of progression, as otherwise it could mutate
 into forms that may take decades to overcome.
No comments:
Post a Comment