MD Nalapat
Manipal, India — Once in office, U.S. President Barack Obama apparently decided to abandon his own policy preferences in favor of those of Bill and Hillary Clinton. Given the reluctance of the former president and the current secretary of state to agree to an equal partnership with India, it is no surprise that the past year has seen the killing-off of the tiny shoots of U.S.-India high-tech cooperation promised by former President George W. Bush.This is despite the eagerness of NASA for joint projects with India. The U.S. space agency is aware that it will continue to be commercially outclassed by the European Union unless it ties up with India's Space Research Organization.
The Indians can undertake space launches that are 40 percent cheaper than the EU. Were NASA to outsource some of its hardware and software needs to India, the agency would outclass the Europeans in almost every segment of space research and exploration. This is why successive NASA administrators have – on record – pushed for closer cooperation with India.
However, the death-grip between Washington and Islamabad has thus far sabotaged all such efforts, even though NASA and ISRO have numerous complementarities, such as in hardware and software.
Showing posts with label Karzai. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Karzai. Show all posts
Tuesday, 26 January 2010
Wednesday, 16 September 2009
President Karzai Gets Hit by "Friendly Fire" (UPIASIA)
M.D. Nalapat
Manipal, India —
If the Taliban are gaining ground in Afghanistan, the reason lies less in their
prowess than the daily errors made by their presumed foes – like NATO, an
organization that clearly swears on the altar of “rule by committee.”
From
think-tankers and journalists to retired diplomats and serving military
personnel, there is an abundant pool of "expertise" in NATO that gets
together to form policy. Within each subset the most extreme views prevail, as
do such views in the same individual at different points in time.
In times past,
those conducting operations in the field would get to decide on tactics rather
than be “remote-controlled.” But these days, NATO's field administrators as
well as managers need to conform to the dictates of superiors who come to
Afghanistan for less than a day at a time and spend most of it in a conference
room. In the process, they pull out dozens of individuals from their work, and
then most simply gaze out the window while the drone of talk continues.
What is NATO’s
objective in Afghanistan? Judging by their tactics, the inference is
inescapable that it is primarily to look good to their own people rather than
working out an effective response to the Taliban.
Labels:
Abdullah,
Afghanistan,
Cheney,
George W. Bush,
Holbrook,
Kabul,
Karzai,
military,
NATO,
Pakistan,
Switzerland,
Taliban,
U.S.
Monday, 18 June 2007
The United States should be Quadricultural, not Unipolar (UPIASIA)
M.D. Nalapat
Manipal, India — By granting itself a
patent on individual freedom combined with democratic elections, the West has
persuaded itself that it is seen as a benign entity in the rest of the world --
almost all of which decades ago was occupied and governed by European countries
intent on using native resources to promote their own interests.
However, the return of Western soldiery to
Afghanistan and Iraq has caused formerly colonized countries to fear that once
again they are at risk of occupation. Both Afghan President Hamid Karzai and
Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri Al-Maliki have zero control over the militaries
swarming across their respective countries, or over many of the functions
normally associated with sovereignty. "Advisors" in both Kabul and
Baghdad have the final say, a fact that is not hidden from the local
populations.
Today, NATO forces in Afghanistan and
Coalition troops in Iraq are ensuring a steady increase in the insurgency.
George W. Bush, Tony Blair, John Howard, Angela Merkel and other Western
leaders have together performed a miracle -- they have made the Saddamites
popular in Iraq and the Taliban recover its resonance in Afghanistan.
Because of the melding of the identities of
the United States and the European Union into a single "Western"
entity, Bush rarely ventures beyond Europe -- and countries with
European-origin majorities -- in securing military allies for his numerous military
sallies into distant lands. Within the United States, only the west coast has
succeeded, to a limited extent, in freeing itself of the delusion that the
United States is a European country transplanted across the Atlantic. The South
and East are in thrall to a concept of nationhood with a European identity at
its core -- a concept expressed in the many writings of Samuel Huntington.
Labels:
Afghanistan,
Africa,
al-Maliki,
India,
Iraq,
Karzai,
Mandela,
NATO,
United States
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)