Pages

Friday, 20 September 2013

SA remains an international joke (PO)

MD Nalapat
Friday, September 20, 2013 - Seven decades after getting free of the British, South Asia is an international joke. Cities across the subcontinent are filthy and with very little evidence of planned development. While those with political connections have become very wealthy, spending increasing amounts of time out of their countries and in Europe and North America, the majority of the population remains under-educated, underfed, poorly housed and desperately poor.

More than four decades ago, this columnist used to walk around streets near his home in Mumbai in the early morning, to refresh himself in the open air after having pored through books for hours. Everywhere, there would be beggars and other destitutes, some asleep but most too hungry and too consumed by pain and discomfort to rest. This columnist was certain that within twenty years, such scenes would disappear into history, when India would be freed of the more extreme manifestations of poverty.

More than double that time has passed, and the only difference between then and now is that the streets are no longer safe for walkabouts during the early hours of the morning. As then, there are destitutes at each street corner, stretching out their hands to beg for a few coins so that they can, for some time at least, still the fires within created by hunger and malnutrition. Historians in India continue to author laudatory tomes on how selfless and magnificent the leaders of India have been, and are.

Recently, a book was written, apparently by someone living abroad, about Sonia Gandhi, in which the architect of India’s 21st century economic collapse is portrayed as a saint who spends much of her time cooking, washing and performing other menial chores for not only her family but staff as well. Another book, just out, is about the youthful Chief Minister of India’s largest state, Uttar Pradesh. The only qualification which enabled Akhilesh Yadav to be appointed the Chief Minister of UP is that he is the son of Samajwadi Party leader Mulayam Singh Yadav. Birth and marriage certificates are essential to progress in the Byzantine alleyways of Indian politics. Both Akhilesh as well as another Chief Minister who has similar qualifications to the UP politician, Jammu & Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah, have been failures in their job.

They have presided over incompetent administrations that have further lowered the already abysmal level of social services and integrity in their respective states. That has not prevented a well-respected journalist, Sunita Aron, to allow emotions to get the better of intellect and write “Winds of Change”, an account of Akhilesh Yadav that is as tinted in roseate hues as the numerous books about the originator of the (2%) “Nehru Rate of Growth”, Jawaharlal Nehru. When Nehru took charge of India, this country was far more developed than (war-ravaged) Japan or South Korea or indeed almost every country to the west and east of India, including China (whose national product was at that time half of India’s size).

Thanks to his slavish adherence to colonial laws and methods of administration, the country which Nehru inherited has become the home for nearly half the globe’s desperately poor people. Although some efforts at economic reform were made during the 1990s and a bit beyond (till 2003,when Atal Behari Vajpayee’s efforts at change ran out of steam), since Sonia Gandhi took de facto charge of the country appointing Manmohan Singh as the de jure leader, opportunities in India have been further constricted by a raft of new regulations, each clearly intended to generate bribes for avoidance of their penal provisions. Civil servants in India have become masters in obliging politicians by tweaking the system and making changes with the sole objective of multiplying the avenues for corruption.

Till about four years ago, before the malefic effects of the harsh regulatory network masterminded by Sonia Gandhi became clear, India was considered an outlier within South Asia. The country was viewed with some respect, and citizens appearing at immigration counters across the globe were treated with respect. Not any more. Once again, India has become - together with the rest of South Asia – an international joke. Textbooks on geopolitics and governance use South Asia as the best model for what to avoid. They point to the region as a cautionary tale of what takes place when the leadership of countries falls into the hands of those whose only objective is to make as much money as possible out of the system and send this to offshore banking havens.

Of course, all the while they talk about the poor and how all their waking hours are spent in working for the underprivileged. It is a wonder as to how those with such frank hypocrisy manage to sleep at night. Clearly, their consciences have long ago shrivelled into insignificance.

The reason why South Asia remains a puddle of graft and mismanagement is that many of the subcontinent’s leaders still believe that the era of colonialism continues. That their people are a subject people, needing not to be assisted but to be exploited and drained of their substance. That their task as masters of the administration is to grab for themselves and those close to them whatever they can get.

Such a colonial mentality afflicts not only politicians but several civil servants and businesspersons in India as well, none of whom have any hesitation in enriching themselves at the expense of the general interest. At its base, the malady that South Asia suffers from is putrid leadership. And until better alernatives emerge from within a flawed political system and finally take charge, the way Deng Xiaoping did in China or Chiang Ching-kuo in Taiwan, there will remain clusters of destitutes at street corners, silently rebuking with their agony those responsible for such a fate, the VVIPs passing by in their motorcades. These, of course, will never see any beggar, for all such unfortunates would have been taken away and deposited out of sight before the VVIP passes by.

http://pakobserver.net/detailnews.asp?id=218760

Sunday, 15 September 2013

Sibal’s school reforms have proved to be a failure (Sunday Guardian)

MD Nalapat
Police arrests Christ Church school principal, Helen Sarkar, at Dum Dum on Thursday. A student there died due to bullying. PTI
apil Sibal loves the United Kingdom, which is why he ensured that those he loves pursued their education there and in other high-priced external locations rather than in India. Indeed, London has become the refuge of choice for much of India's political class, who feel relaxed in an atmosphere uncluttered by the "mango people," who lack the money needed for stays in that super-expensive city. During the period when he was the Human Resource Development Minister, Sibal sought to ensure that schoolchildren in India have the same freedom from punishment as their counterparts in the UK. That there are differences between students in the UK and those in India, differences in living standards and in acculturation, is a small point omitted by Kapil Sibal when he issued decrees that teachers in India ought to adopt a "turn the other cheek" approach towards their wards, even while the latter were themselves free with their slaps and worse.
Another of Sibal's gifts to the student community was to seek to remove the fear of examinations from the mind of the schoolgoer, at least till the final (Board) exam. So, not only are teachers to abjure such barbaric acts as caning or scolding even the most recalcitrant of students, they are unable to force them to do at least some reading through the fear that a class would get repeated. In places such as Kolkata, teachers were sent to prison — where they still are — because a child committed suicide. Was it because of hazing and worse by seniors, as usually happens in schools to students regarded as physically attractive to their seniors? Was it because of over-expectation of achievement by the family and harsh words said after under-achievement? None of these possibilities were even considered by the media or by the police in that city. Instead, a barrage of media reports that painted them as devils was followed by a speedy trial and sentencing. After witnessing such a fate, it would be a foolhardy schoolteacher, who would dare to chastise a student, even if the youth were guilty of behaviour that would be frowned upon in the genteel atmosphere of the Sibal home.
Even before Kapil Sibal entered the ring, there existed a class of students, who were immune from any form of punishment. These were the student leaders belonging to major political parties. Determined to set a good example to their peers, such worthies often miss class and bully others. Because of the fear that the political parties to which such elements belong would exact retribution, teachers cower before these budding politicians, indulging them whenever feasible. Post Sibal, this Exempted Category has grown to include the entire student body.
{
Even before Kapil Sibal entered the ring, there existed a class of students, who were immune from any form of punishment.
Now that the stick has been taken away from teachers, at last in locations where television cameras lurk, it is small wonder that acts of indiscipline have multiplied in many schools. Obedience to Sibal's commandment to spare not only the rod but any form of remonstration at unruly behaviour has made teachers helpless before students, even those who prey on younger ones. In such a context, to form a phalanx demanding prison and worse for an individual simply because she is unfortunate enough to be the headmistress of a school where rowdies rag freshers is hardly likely to boost the morale of a profession that is crucial to building the future of the country.
In the Kolkata case, certainly, the tormentors of the 11-year-old need to be identified and brought to justice. Of course, looking at the lenient treatment given to a presumed juvenile, who showed no compunction in violating a young woman in a miscellany of ways and with force sufficient to cause death, it is not likely that those actually responsible for this crime will get the quantum of punishment they deserve. However, arresting and afterwards subjecting the headmistress of the school to a prison sentence will hardly meet the ends of any other than mob justice.
Given the paucity of means at their disposal to check abuse and violence on the part of their wards, it is a cruel irony to send to jail individuals who have been made powerless by the Sibal reform of our school system, policies that have made classrooms less safe and the product of school education less likely to emerge as citizens with the drive and discipline needed for excellence.

Saturday, 14 September 2013

The Jaitley factor, not Namo, behind BJP dissent (Sunday Guardian)

MADHAV NALAPAT  New Delhi | 14th Sep 2013
BJP supporters celebrate after Narendra Modi was declared BJP’s Prime Ministerial candidate in New Delhi on Friday. PTI
enior leaders in the BJP say privately that it was not opposition to Narendra Modi but disquiet at the Prime Ministerial nominee's perceived reliance on the Leader of the Opposition (Rajya Sabha) Arun Jaitley "that caused Sushma Swaraj and M.M. Joshi to cast their lot initially with L.K. Advani, who has his own personal reasons for opposing Modi". These leaders claim that in the hundred-odd days since Modi was anointed the Campaign Committee chief, his absence from Delhi led to the Jaitley group taking advantage of the Modi connection to grab power from the other Delhi-based leaders of the party, including general secretary Ananth Kumar, Leader of the Opposition (Lok Sabha) Sushma Swaraj, former BJP presidents Nitin Gadkari and Venkaiah Naidu, as well as senior leader M.M. Joshi. They, together with other leaders such as Yashwant Sinha and Shatrughan Sinha, share with Sushma Swaraj an antipathy to Jaitley and claim that this opinion is held by BJP president Rajnath Singh as well.
Only Advani is seen as opposed to Modi per se, rather than because of the Jaitley factor. The BJP patriarch apparently believes that Modi should have "stepped aside for him as he himself did for a more secular face, Atalji", according to a BJP leader sympathetic to Advani.
"Arun Jaitley is an expert at manipulating the media and planting reports against leaders he dislikes," alleged a senior BJP leader, who was once a part of the Vajpayee Cabinet. Another added that "Jaitley is too cosy with the Congress, especially its top leadership" and that during his time as Law Minister, "help was given to the Congress, which went against the party's interest". This charge was refuted by a source close to Jaitley, who said that on the contrary, "Arunji has been the foremost critic of the Congress and its leadership" and that claims that he helped the Congress are "lies told by jealous people".
Within the top echelons of the BJP, there is a widespread perception that "Arun Jaitley is Narendra Modi's single window in Delhi", in the words of a senior office-bearer, who added that "Jaitley has ensured that those opposed to him get denied meetings with Modiji". Two senior office-bearers vented their view that Modi's acolyte Amit Shah "only listens to Jaitley and takes instructions from him". According to a Jaitley-friendly office-bearer, this is because "Narendra Modi respects Arun Jaitley's opinion and knows that his (Jaitley's) advice is best for the party in UP". He pointed to the "several states where Arunji's superior management made the BJP win despite strong opposition from Congress".
According to a senior leader in the party, even key RSS functionaries such as Dharmendra Pradhan and Suresh Soni are "under Jaitley's influence". They point to the fact that "Subramanian Swamy's induction into the BJP was delayed for six months even though the RSS and L.K. Advani as well as Nitin Gadkari joined hands with Narendra Modi and Sushma Swaraj in supporting Swamy" and that "only when Jaitley stopped opposing Swamy, was the Janata Party chief inducted". A leader opposed to Jaitley claims that the Leader of the Opposition (RS) is supporting Modi "in the hope that after the elections he will not get the support needed to form the government". At that point, Jaitley will "step forward as the secular choice", a la Vajpayee, "as the man closest to Narendra Modi". Those close to Jaitley say that the BJP leader has no such ambition but would be "happy to serve under Narendra Modi" in any future government.
http://www.sunday-guardian.com/news/the-jaitley-factor-not-namo-behind-bjp-dissent

Modi self-confidence overcomes doubts (Sunday Guardian)

MADHAV NALAPAT  New Delhi | 14th Sep 2013
Narendra Modi has been the subject of a campaign of abuse with few parallels, and yet there has been no change in his belief in destiny.
arendra Damodardas Modi has travelled a considerable distance since he was born in a simple household in his home state of Gujarat. This writer first identified Modi as a prospective Prime Minister in 2006, but it was only after the 2010 Commonwealth Games and 2G scandals and a perceived paralysis in governance at the national level that the view grew within growing sections of the Indian people that Narendra Modi was the answer to their woes. That the Gujarat Chief Minister had the knowledge of grassroots' need as well as the administrative skills needed to ignite this country's lumbering bureaucracy into action. Not that such an elevation into national status was the result of social or political advantages. Modi comes from a humble background, and belongs to — in his own words — "the most backward" of backward classes. Neither has he ever had a godfather in politics, the way so many other leaders have. If his stint as a party functionary is omitted, Narendra Modi's first job was that of a tea boy boiling water and mixing tea leaves, milk and sugar into the brew for his brother to sell on railway platforms. His next job was the chief ministership of Gujarat. And the third destination, according to several psephologists, is 7 Race Course Road, the official residence of the Prime Minister of India.
How did Modi traverse so far, so fast, and with so little support from the top? Even brief encounters with the man reveal him to have a self-confidence that overcomes doubts and even realities. In some of the (few and usually brief) meetings that this writer has had with the Gujarat CM, what comes across is a refusal to be affected by the many out to get him. References to efforts to implicate him in encounter killings are met not with a worried raising of eyebrows but smile and a "let them try" look. Since he emerged as the BJP's paramount leader in 2010, Narendra Modi has been the subject of a campaign of abuse with few parallels, and yet there has been no change in his belief in destiny. The only other individual with such total and visible self-confidence was Sanjay Gandhi. In 1977, when he was in the dock for charges related to the destruction of films, Sanjay exuded an electricity that overawed onlookers and police officials, making them subdued in his presence. This despite the fact that at that point in time, Sanjay Gandhi was without any means of governmental assistance, being the prime target (together with his mother) of the Janata Party regime which had Charan Singh as the Union Home Minister.
In his persona, Narendra Modi exudes the same self-assurance and the same determination to implement decisions that were the hallmarks of Sanjay Gandhi. While there has been much criticism of Indira Gandhi' second son, especially when he was out of power, the reality remains that "Each One Teach One" or the planting of millions of trees were measures that would, if implemented in full, have transformed the face of the country. Even the family planning program was a necessity, although the manner of its implementation resulted in a revulsion towards the very idea of limitation of family size.
{
Narendra Modi has been the subject of a campaign of abuse with few parallels, and yet there has been no change in his belief in destiny.
Narendra Modi has the same drive and determination to change India, with much more administrative skill in doing so than did Sanjay, who never in his life held an official post. There has been a well-planned effort to define Narendra Modi by the six days in his 12-year rule which saw riots across Gujarat where both Hindus as well as Muslims died, and where more than a dozen Hindus were shot dead by the police as they went about killing innocent Muslims in a blind rage. During those terrible days in Ahmedabad, it was possible to see youths belonging to both Congress and BJP families grabbing hold of weapons and rushing onto the streets intent on mayhem. It was as though a collective rage had settled across Gujarat and wiped out the legacy of Mahatma Gandhi. Although he has been condemned for his lack of success in preventing the riots, the fact remains that they took place at such speed and with such virulence that it was doubtful if anyone else could have done better. At that time, Modi had spent just a few months into his new job. However, he clearly learnt from the experience, for since then there has not been a single communal flare-up in Gujarat, nor a single individual losing his or her life as a result of the madness of communal hatred.
What is forgotten in reproductions of the 2002 riots is that more than a quarter of those killed belonged to the majority community. To portray it as a pogrom on the lines of the 1984 killings of Sikhs in Delhi (where no member of the majority community was killed, nor any policeman) is to give oxygen to those who seek to spread terror and violence across India on the excuse that this country is "not safe for minorities".
There is no difference between Hindus, Sikhs, Christians, Muslims and those of other faiths.
All are part of the marvellous tapestry of India's composite culture. There are strands of the Vedic, the Mughal and the Western in each of us, as has been articulated in the Doctrine of Indutva. Those who seek to divide India on the basis of religion are wrong and need to look back at the lessons of history, to see the pain and the disadvantages that have accrued to the entire subcontinent by the 1947 vivisection of India. And as for the minorities, a society is defined by its treatment of the minority. If there is discrimination against them, or persecution in any form, such a society cannot be termed civilised. Hence, looking at the record, we see that in Gujarat post-2002, there has not been a single communal incident while in Uttar Pradesh (ruled by a party that calls itself secular and a great friend of the minorities) there have been clashes almost every month, with the latest being the deadly violence in Muzaffarnagar. Looking at the record, it seems clear that minorities would be safer with a Prime Minister Modi, who has managed a decade of communal peace in a communally sensitive state, than with a Prime Minister Akhilesh, who has signally failed to protect human life, not just once but dozens of times. Rather than constantly harp on "Majority" and "Minority", what is needed is to emphasize the fact that we are all Indians, no matter to what faith we subscribe.
Unlike so many of our politicians, who feel more at home in Miami or London than in Kolkata or Chennai, Narendra Modi is 100% of India, and would feel uncomfortable anywhere else. Rather than French cuisine or Japanese, it is clear that all that Modi savours is desi khana, desi music and desi attitudes. However, this does not mean a false hostility towards the English language.
It is clear that Modi understands that knowledge of English is essential for progress, and that we ought to welcome the world rather than shut our doors to it. The fundamental strand of the Gujarati character is a practical common sense, and a knowledge that a full stomach is needed before any effort at contemplation of cosmic issues should be attempted.
Modi places emphasis on development, on triggering a process whereby India would get launched on the same 15% annual growth trajectory as China in the 1980s. For that, there needs to be communal harmony and modern education. There needs to be sound policy honestly implemented. Should, as many believe it will, 2014 usher in the Modi Era in India, it will soon become clear whether or not he can reproduce his success in Gujarat across the rest of the country.
Certainly he will make every effort to succeed. To Narendra Modi, a working day stretches for fourteen hours and a week for seven full days of intense effort.

Friday, 13 September 2013

AIPAC sides with Al-Qaeda (PO)

M D Nalapat

Friday, September 13, 2013 - Allow this columnist to say here what he did at public fora in Tehran and Damascusa, that he is an admirer of the Jewish people. Despite their small numbers, this is a community which has given the world immense gifts in the form of technology, arts and education. The terrible fate that met the Jewish people in Europe during 1933-45 has given legitimacy to their desire for a separate homeland where they can be protected. Some believed that this ought to have been carved out of Germany, the country that supervised the killing of more than 6 million Jews. Indeed, this is what was said by this columnist in a Letter to the Editor to the Economist magazine decades back, when he was in his teens. However, the Jewish Homeland was located not within Germany but in Palestine, where the State of Israel has become a reality that needs to be accepted as much as Australia, the US and Canada ( all three countries where migration from Europe created a change in the chemistry of governance).

The peoples of Europe have for more than six centuries been far more prolific in their discoveries than their counterparts in Asia, which is why by the 1800s almost all of Asia came under European control. The lands that have been created by European migration are, each of them, facts of life that cannot be reversed. The indigenous communities of Canada, Australia and the US will not even be dreaming these days of getting their ancient patrimony back. They were overwhelmed by the European tide, exactly the way the Incas in South America were, although in the latter continent, there is a re-assertion of the indigenous people after centuries of domination by ethnic Europeans .

The State of Israel has become a technological giant, becoming a world leader in military and civilian uses of brainpower. Were the states around Israel to adopt that country’s methods of dryland farming, the region would have become a granary. There is much that can benefit both sides, were Israel and its neighbours to become allies rather than foes. However, such a prospect seems very distant, although historical accidents may occur which leads to reconciliation. It is no secret that India and Israel have a close relationship, just as Delhi has with the GCC states or Iran.

In a world where the Jewish community has been maltreated for millennia, India is a country where there has never been hostility towards the Jews. Hopefully, at least a few of the Indian Jews who migrated to other countries because of the stifling controls on the economy introduced by Jawaharlal Nehru and Indira Gandhi, will come back. The Jewish community is as prosperous as the other small communities in India, the Jains and the Parsees. Each such group gives vibrancy to the multifaith mosaic of life in the world’s most populous - albeit incomplete - democracy. It is only when religious and ethnic tensions are low or absent that a country progresses. Where there is discrimination and fanaticism, human development suffers. This columnist remembers his doctrine of Indutva, which holds that the culture of India is a composite of the Vedic, the Mughal and the Western. All three strands are present in each son and daughter of India, and hence those who seek to claim that Hindus, Muslims and Christians have different cultures are wrong. Each has a composite culture, and it is well known in metallurgy that composite materials are stronger than the elements mixed in them.

Coming back to Israel, that state has influential friends in the US, and none more powerful than the small but vibrant Jewish community in that country. Among the organisations backing Israel, the America Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) is the most influential. This columnist has met some of the volunteers in AIPAC and has been impressed by their energy and dedication. Which is why it is with shock that news comes of AIPAC being among the lead organisations in the “Bomb Syria” chorus in US. Already there is much writing within the West Asian region of a “Jewish conspiracy” behind President Obama’s decision to attack Syria despite the fact that such a step would benefit not the Syrian people but Al-Qaeda. Backing by AIPAC for such a move would only reinforce those who - wrongly - argue that it is Israel that is to blame were an attack by the US and France to take place. Clearly AIPAC has no idea of what is happening in Syria. The organization seems

unaware of the fact that John Kerry is lying when he speaks of the “moderate opposition”. Such “fighters” exist only in the comfort of 5-star hotel rooms in Istanbul,Doha and Paris. Those in the field are overwhelmingly from organisations that have signed on to the exclusivist agenda of the many fanatic groups who seek to create their own version of a state out of parts of Syria. Those tracking the cash and weapons going to the “moderate opposition” from NATO and the GCC say that within a few days, these end up in the hands of Al Nusra, and that regional intelligence agencies (who are heavily infiltrated by extremist elements masquerading as moderates) are aware of this.

Even a check of the videos put out by Al Nusra and its offshoots (and after all, the US,UK and France now base their “evidence” only on videos) would show that the weapons the fighters are using are the same that have been given to the Free Syrian Army, a ghost army that exists only as a conduit to the fanatics. In the many videos showing executions of Syrian army personnel and Christians and Alawites, the weopons placed beside the executioners are those channeled by Turkey, Qatar, the US and France to the “moderates” AIPAC has harmed the interests of the Jewish people by its unwise adherence to Nobel Peace Prizeman Barack Obama’s doctrine of killing people to protect their human rights. It has given fresh oxygen to the many conspiracy theories who blame the Jewish people for the violence unleashed by the war in Syria. And it has placed its own country at risk of facing the threat that Israel has been coping with since Ariel Sharon backed one group in the Lebanese civil war against another (1982). Hopefully, better counsel will prevail and the organization stand on the side of peace, the side which the overwhelming majority of Muslims, Christians and Jews worldwide are backing.

http://pakobserver.net/detailnews.asp?id=217945

Sunday, 8 September 2013

Time to end the Christian Calvary in West Asia (Sunday Guardian)

Demonstrators against military action in Syria, outside the US embassy in London on Tuesday. PTI/AP
hose who have watched The Passion of the Christ would have learnt of Aramaic, the ancient Hebrew-related language, which was spoken by Jesus Christ and his disciples. Not all the piety in Rome, Paris, Dublin or Boston has led to an attempt to spread this melodic language beyond the confines of the single location where it is still spoken, 2,013 years after Jesus was hoisted onto the cross, the little town of Maalula in Syria. 16 years ago, when Hafez Assad was still the master of his country, this columnist was taken from Damascus to Maalula on the way to the Golan Heights.
Since then, a lot of change came about in Syria, with the empty spaces that defined the journey getting replaced by tourist resorts and farms made more prosperous by the — admittedly basic — liberalisation carried out under the regime of his son Bashar. Not only in Damascus but elsewhere, in Aleppo or in the picturesque hills, where the Druze tribes lived, it was possible in the early months of 2011 to see women dressed the way they are in New Orleans or in Marseille. Headscarves were the exception, although within the folds of modern attire, there was still piety. Syria under Bashar Assad was authoritarian but secular and the oldest church in Christendom, the Syrian Orthodox Church and its head, the Patriarch of Antioch, felt no blast of opprobrium as he and his flock went about their prayers and rituals.
Whether to oblige his friends in Qatar and Saudi Arabia, who have — along with the rest of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) — been lavish in awarding contracts to Turkish companies that are connected to the ruling establishment in Ankara, or simply because he loves the Muslim Brotherhood as an organisation, Prime Minister Erdogan insisted that Bashar Assad should include the group in his government. Aware that such a move would be about as wise as Jawaharlal Nehru's acceptance of Lord Wavell's 1946 request to include Jinnah's Muslim League in the Interim Government, Assad refused. From then onwards, Turkey made no secret of the fact that it was arming and sponsoring the armed war against Assad that continues to this day.
Money has flowed in from within the region and outside to these "freedom fighters", as have a miscellany of adventurers from the US, France and the UK, all eager to impart knowledge of the use of explosive force to the international volunteers in the war for control of Syria. Clearly, the International Court of Justice at the Hague does not regard the setting loose by another within a sovereign country of armed mercenaries (some of whom have been paid $5,000 for killing a single officer of the Syrian army, although the usual rate is a mere $1,500). Unemployed youth in their thousands have volunteered for battle, thereby forming a pool of manpower that may transform itself into a colossal security threat to the EU and to the GCC, once the Syrian operation is over. Boys will be boys.
West Asia is the home of the Christian faith, and as mentioned earlier, its oldest church. Christian communities throughout the region are distinguished by their high educational standards and modern outlook. Overall, they have made immense contributions to their home countries, exactly the way Christians in India have. This columnist was educated at first a Jesuit (Campion in Mumbai) and later an Anglo-Indian school (Frank Anthony Public School in Delhi) and is the better for it. Which is why, it is painful to watch as Christian communities in the region are being subjected to their own Calvary (extreme suffering). In Egypt and in Libya, churches have been destroyed by those who are treated with deference and generosity by the West, supposedly a bloc where the Christian faith is not altogether extinct.
In Egypt, the ancient Coptic Church is under incessant attack from the very elements that Barack Obama, David Cameron and Francois Hollande (the trio eager to bomb Syria so as to protect civilians) are insisting should be re-inserted into the highest portals of governance. Now in Syria, elders of the church are getting their throats cut by the groups that John Kerry has publicly certified as "moderate". Too bad for Adolf Hitler that Kerry was not around during his 12 years of rule. Certainly, the US Secretary of State would have had a good word for the Nazis, exactly as he has for those who everybody in Syria (but not Kerry) knows belongs to Al Nusra and other groups of Certified Moderates. When will this Calvary end? Only if those backed by Obama, Hollande and Cameron fail. Given that the bombs are soon to land on a military battling against Al Qaeda, that seems an uncertain prospect.

http://www.sunday-guardian.com/analysis/time-to-end-the-christian-calvary-in-west-asia