By M D Nalapat
The hold of government and its agencies over India’s citizens is pervasive.
At
the core of colonial thinking is the belief that the people being ruled
are immature and are, indeed, almost idiots in their lack of capacity
to take independent decisions. Thus the British colonial government
passed laws and imposed regulations that covered almost every human
activity besides breathing. By this means, individual initiative was
steadily reduced and a culture of dependence on the state and its
minions was developed, that still thrives today. An example is the
“Swachh Bharat” programme. By levying taxes in its name, Government of
India has inadvertently created the public premise that this is just
another government-led initiative, when the reality is that only
wholehearted participation by the people can assure the success of the
mission to ensure a cleaner India. Both by levying taxes in the name of
Swachh Bharat and by choosing mascots not from among ordinary citizens
but from within a list of celebrities, this imaginative campaign is at
risk of being ignored by the people. Such indeed has been the fate of
almost every government initiative, so deep is the identification of
even the post-1947 governments with the colonial past, a fusion that the
visible separation of the governors from the governed does little to
dilute. Whether it be the separate line at immigration counters at
airports, or the red lights flashing atop their vehicles, those claiming
to be “public servants” seem to take pride in ensuring a chasm between
themselves and the people on whose behalf they are presumed to rule. It
was expected of Prime Minister Narendra Modi that he would take steps to
transform the administrative system from the present 19th century model
into a construct in sync with the 21st century, and hopefully this will
happen before the end of his term in 2019.
Transformative change means an alteration in the mechanics
and processes of governance, including by ensuring that selection to
the Central services be carried out through recruitment from the outside
at all levels, even while a strict weeding out of deadwood gets carried
out as is already routine in the military. Above all, the legal system
needs to get cleansed of the thousands of laws that have zero public
purpose and only serve to ensure the continued servitude of the citizen
to the whims of the state. Even seven decades after Jawaharlal Nehru
promised a new dawn of freedom, the space available to the ordinary
citizen in India is minuscule as compared to the freedoms enjoyed by
citizens of countries such as the UK or the US.
Almost daily, citizens are made aware of just how
pervasive the hold of government and its agencies is over them in India,
with far too many activities needing official sanction before getting
carried out. Of course, each such roadblock means another palm stretched
out for a bribe. Small wonder that the roads of Paris and London, not
to mention Miami, are choked with family members of senior functionaries
of the government spending some of the money “earned” by those in high
positions. Although Prime Minister Modi has been seeking to make
progress in his “Make in India” initiative, this will become possible
only once it is ensured that the ease of doing business in India
significantly improves. No other major power has witnessed a situation
where 86% of its currency gets demonetised at four hours’ notice, or an
entire sector gets drained of key players the way the previously
fast-growing telecom sector was during the period in office of Manmohan
Singh. All of a sudden, major global players such as Batelco, Swiss
Telecom, Etisalat, Telenor and Docomo were made to exit the country, and
it is likely that Aircel will follow in their wake very soon. To
prevent further economic cost to the country, the Supreme Court needs to
devise ways in which those guilty of misfeasance get punished (for
example, by having their equity shares frozen unless they turn up at
court hearings) without an entire company getting wound up. Which is
what would happen if, for example, a telecom company were to be deprived
of its spectrum rather than just a few individuals at the top be
deprived of the rights adhering to their equity shares. The interests of
customers, employees and financial institutions need to be protected by
the courts in their decisions, so that the economy does not suffer
loss, but instead, there be greater accountability on the part of those
managing an enterprise.
Added to the almost impenetrable jungle of laws,
regulations and practices extant in India, there is the added danger of a
company being forced to exit its business as a consequence of court
orders. Both the government as well as the judiciary need to bear in
mind that only double digit growth has the capacity to prevent an Arab
Spring-style chaos from proliferating in India during the coming years,
because of more than two hundred million youths who are in effect
unemployed, with tens of millions of them being uneducated as well. The
willingness of the people to always be at the receiving end of a stream
of commands is coming under strain in a context where the governance
system is failing to generate enough jobs and growth. The Jallikattu
agitation in Tamil Nadu is indicative of the desire of the citizen to
reclaim some of the space for individual freedom and initiative that was
lost centuries ago with the coming into power of the Colonial State.
The people of India have shown their ability to ensure prosperity if
allowed freedom, as they have repeatedly proved in countries where the
quantum of individual liberty is far higher than in this country. It is
time for the institutions of the state to recognise the imperative of
the need for a governance system that respects the imperative of a
post-colonial level of freedom. They need to ensure changes in the
mechanics of governance which put into effect Prime Minister Narendra
Modi’s promise of “Minimum Government”.
http://www.sundayguardianlive.com/opinion/8098-indians-need-their-own-21st-century-space
No comments:
Post a Comment